Description
For this paper, I want it based on the TV show The Kardashians. This needs to be very opinionated as to why they are bad for society. I would like the claim to be that they as a family are unhealthy for society because of the unrealistic lifestyles and body images they portray. This essay needs 2 primary and 2 secondary sources The rubric is attached and I also need an annotated bibliography attached at the bottom of the essays from the sources you used.Project 2: “’Keepin’ It Real”: Reviewing a
Reality Television Show” / Dr. Catalina
Bartlett for WRA 101
Exemplary 4.0 Proficient 3.0 Emerging 2.0 Inconsistent 1.0
FOCUS—
The critical review analyzes a reality
television show on a specific
contemporary issue either explicitly or
implicitly found in the show. The review
creates a powerful and persuasive
argument about this issue with a
compelling angle, clear claim andsupporting fact-based evidence in the
form of primary and secondary sources.
The critical review has a clear purpose
and audience.
The critical review is an
exemplary persuasive argument,
using an identifiable angle to
draw readers in, and a clear
claim + supporting evidence to
highlight the chosen issue.
Primary and secondary sources
are incorporated into the
argument. The claim is the
author’s own (and not other
writers’ or scholars’), and thesupporting evidence supports
the author’s claim. Its purpose
and audience are completely
intentional.
The critical review is a
proficient persuasive
argument, using a mostly
identifiable angle to draw
readers in, and a relatively
clear claim + supporting
evidence to highlight the
chosen issue. Its purpose and
audience are mostly
intentional.
The critical review is an
emerging persuasive argument
using claim + evidence to
highlight the applicant’s skills,
knowledges, and abilities as a
potential contestant. Its
purpose and audience are
somewhat intentional.
The critical review offers an
inconsistent argument. It does
not have an identifiable angle,
nor does it use claim +
evidence persuasively to
highlight the chosen issue. s a
potential contestant. Its
purpose and audience are
unintentional.
DEVELOPMENT—
The critical review is persuasive in its
centering of the social issue, using an
angle, and arguing its claim through
factual evidence. This critical review
demonstrates this through a considered
authorial claim, the experiences of
contestants on the show and the show
itself, and other writers/scholars whosefact-based research supports the
author’s claim. The writer interprets the
issue, the show’s handling of it, and the
potential impact on audience and/or
contestants.
The critical review, its focus on a
chosen social issue, and its
structure as a review are
significantly developed. The
author’s claim is clearly and
persuasively demonstrated
through their considered
interpretation, primary sources,
and secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation
strategically discusses the issue
as it is handled by the show.
The critical review, its focus
on a chosen social issue, and
its structure as a review are
mostly developed. The
author’s claim is mostly clear
and persuasive as
demonstrated through their
considered interpretation,
primary sources, and
secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation
mostly is strategic in
discussing the issue as it is
handled by the show.
The critical review, its focus on
a chosen social issue, and its
structure as a review are
somewhat developed. The
author’s claim is somewhat
clear and persuasive as
demonstrated through their
considered interpretation,
primary sources, and
secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation is
somewhat strategic in
discussing the issue as it is
handled by the show.
The critical review, its focus on
a chosen social issue, and its
structure as a review are
inconsistently developed. The
author’s claim is inconsistently
clear and persuasive as
demonstrated through their
considered interpretation,
primary sources, and
secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation is
inconsistently strategic in
discussing the issue as it is
handled by the show.
SOURCES—
The writer has incorporated a minimum
of 2 primary sources and 2 secondary
sources into their critical review. They
have used these sources to support their
own argument; they have not used the
sources the make the argument for
them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary sources
are incorporated into the
argument in an exemplary
fashion. The author has used
these sources persuasively and
well to support their own
argument. The author does not
rely on the sources to make the
argument for them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary
sources are mostly
incorporated into the
argument. The author has
used these sources mostly
well and persuasively to
support their own argument.
The author mostly does not
rely on the sources to make
the argument for them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary
sources are somewhat
incorporated into the
argument. The author has used
these sources somewhat well
and persuasively to support
their own argument. The
author somewhat does not rely
on the sources to make the
argument for them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary
sources are inconsistently
incorporated into the
argument. The author has used
these sources inconsistently to
support their own argument.
The author relies on the
sources to make the argument
for them.
ARRANGEMENT—
The critical review argues persuasively
by balancing the author’s considered
opinion, the primary sources from
contestants and the show itself, and
secondary sources about the show to
highlight the issue and its complications
in the chosen reality television show.
The organization of the critical review is
appropriate to its purpose, the genre of
the critical review, and the audience.
The critical review argues
persuasively and exemplarily by
balancing the author’s
considered opinion, the primary
sources from contestants and
the show itself, and secondary
sources about the show to
highlight the issue and its
complications in the chosen
reality television show. The
organization of the critical
review is appropriate to its
purpose, the genre of the critical
review, and the audience.
The critical review argues
proficiently by balancing the
author’s considered opinion,
the primary sources from
contestants and the show
itself, and secondary sources
about the show to highlight
the issue and its
complications in the chosen
reality television show. The
organization of the critical
review is mostly appropriate
to its purpose, the genre of
the critical review, and the
audience.
The critical review makes an
emerging argument by
attempting to balance the
author’s considered opinion,
the primary sources from
contestants and the show
itself, and secondary sources
about the show to highlight the
issue and its complications in
the chosen reality television
show. The organization of the
critical review is somewhat
appropriate to its purpose, the
genre of the critical review,
and the audience.
The critical review makes an
inconsistent argument without
satisfactorily balancing the
author’s considered opinion,
the primary sources from
contestants and the show
itself, and secondary sources
about the show to highlight the
issue and its complications in
the chosen reality television
show. The organization of the
critical review is not
appropriate to its purpose, the
genre of the critical review,
and the audience.
TONE, LANGUAGE, & STYLE
The critical review uses an
exemplary tone and language
appropriate to the chosen
audience. The style of the critical
review is accessible and aimed
at the audience. It is not a 5-
paragraph essay or a term
paper, even though it contains
research and a sound argument.
The critical review uses a
proficient tone and language
appropriate to the chosen
audience. The style of the
critical review is mostly
accessible and aimed at the
audience. It is mostly not a 5-
paragraph essay or a term
paper, even though it contains
research and a sound
argument.
The critical review somewhat
uses a tone and language
appropriate to the chosen
audience. The style of the
critical review is somewhat
accessible and aimed at the
audience. It is somewhat
structured as a 5-paragraph
essay or a term paper, and it
somewhat contains research
and a sound argument.
The critical review
inconsistently uses a tone and
language appropriate to the
chosen audience. The style of
the critical review is not
accessible and not aimed at the
audience. It is structured as a
5-paragraph essay or a term
paper, and it does not contain
research and a sound
argument.
FORMAT & MLA STYLE—
The critical review is 3-5 pages and the
Reflection is 1-2 pages, all formatted in
MLA Style, double spaced, with page #s,
headers, 1” margins, 12-point font.
The critical review format is
exemplary.
The critical review format is
proficient.
The critical review format is
emerging.
The critical review format is
inconsistent.
REFLECTION—
The Reflection reflects on the process of
writing Project 2 and shows evidence of
intentional decisions about the chosen
issue and the review of the television
show. It discusses revision strategies,
new learning(s) for the writer, and
overall strengths and challenges of the
project
The Reflection shows exemplary
reflections on writing process
and decisions.
The Reflection shows
proficient reflections on
writing process and decisions.
The Reflection shows emerging
reflections on writing process
and decisions.
The Reflection shows
inconsistent reflections on
writing process and decisions,
or is absent. Project 2: “’Keepin’ It Real”: Reviewing a
Reality Television Show” / Dr. Catalina
Bartlett for WRA 101
Exemplary 4.0 Proficient 3.0 Emerging 2.0 Inconsistent 1.0
FOCUS—
The critical review analyzes a reality
television show on a specific
contemporary issue either explicitly or
implicitly found in the show. The review
creates a powerful and persuasive
argument about this issue with a
compelling angle, clear claim and
supporting fact-based evidence in the
form of primary and secondary sources.
The critical review has a clear purpose
and audience.
The critical review is an
exemplary persuasive argument,
using an identifiable angle to
draw readers in, and a clear
claim + supporting evidence to
highlight the chosen issue.
Primary and secondary sources
are incorporated into the
argument. The claim is the
author’s own (and not other
writers’ or scholars’), and the
supporting evidence supports
the author’s claim. Its purpose
and audience are completely
intentional.
The critical review is a
proficient persuasive
argument, using a mostly
identifiable angle to draw
readers in, and a relatively
clear claim + supporting
evidence to highlight the
chosen issue. Its purpose and
audience are mostly
intentional.
The critical review is an
emerging persuasive argument
using claim + evidence to
highlight the applicant’s skills,
knowledges, and abilities as a
potential contestant. Its
purpose and audience are
somewhat intentional.
The critical review offers an
inconsistent argument. It does
not have an identifiable angle,
nor does it use claim +
evidence persuasively to
highlight the chosen issue. s a
potential contestant. Its
purpose and audience are
unintentional.
DEVELOPMENT—
The critical review is persuasive in its
centering of the social issue, using an
angle, and arguing its claim through
factual evidence. This critical review
demonstrates this through a considered
authorial claim, the experiences of
contestants on the show and the show
itself, and other writers/scholars whose
fact-based research supports the
author’s claim. The writer interprets the
issue, the show’s handling of it, and the
potential impact on audience and/or
contestants.
The critical review, its focus on a
chosen social issue, and its
structure as a review are
significantly developed. The
author’s claim is clearly and
persuasively demonstrated
through their considered
interpretation, primary sources,
and secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation
strategically discusses the issue
as it is handled by the show.
The critical review, its focus
on a chosen social issue, and
its structure as a review are
mostly developed. The
author’s claim is mostly clear
and persuasive as
demonstrated through their
considered interpretation,
primary sources, and
secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation
mostly is strategic in
discussing the issue as it is
handled by the show.
The critical review, its focus on
a chosen social issue, and its
structure as a review are
somewhat developed. The
author’s claim is somewhat
clear and persuasive as
demonstrated through their
considered interpretation,
primary sources, and
secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation is
somewhat strategic in
discussing the issue as it is
handled by the show.
The critical review, its focus on
a chosen social issue, and its
structure as a review are
inconsistently developed. The
author’s claim is inconsistently
clear and persuasive as
demonstrated through their
considered interpretation,
primary sources, and
secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation is
inconsistently strategic in
discussing the issue as it is
handled by the show.
SOURCES—
The writer has incorporated a minimum
of 2 primary sources and 2 secondary
sources into their critical review. They
have used these sources to support their
own argument; they have not used the
sources the make the argument for
them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary sources
are incorporated into the
argument in an exemplary
fashion. The author has used
these sources persuasively and
well to support their own
argument. The author does not
rely on the sources to make the
argument for them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary
sources are mostly
incorporated into the
argument. The author has
used these sources mostly
well and persuasively to
support their own argument.
The author mostly does not
rely on the sources to make
the argument for them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary
sources are somewhat
incorporated into the
argument. The author has used
these sources somewhat well
and persuasively to support
their own argument. The
author somewhat does not rely
on the sources to make the
argument for them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary
sources are inconsistently
incorporated into the
argument. The author has used
these sources inconsistently to
support their own argument.
The author relies on the
sources to make the argument
for them.
ARRANGEMENT—
The critical review argues persuasively
by balancing the author’s considered
opinion, the primary sources from
contestants and the show itself, and
secondary sources about the show to
highlight the issue and its complications
in the chosen reality television show.
The organization of the critical review is
appropriate to its purpose, the genre of
the critical review, and the audience.
The critical review argues
persuasively and exemplarily by
balancing the author’s
considered opinion, the primary
sources from contestants and
the show itself, and secondary
sources about the show to
highlight the issue and its
complications in the chosen
reality television show. The
organization of the critical
review is appropriate to its
purpose, the genre of the critical
review, and the audience.
The critical review argues
proficiently by balancing the
author’s considered opinion,
the primary sources from
contestants and the show
itself, and secondary sources
about the show to highlight
the issue and its
complications in the chosen
reality television show. The
organization of the critical
review is mostly appropriate
to its purpose, the genre of
the critical review, and the
audience.
The critical review makes an
emerging argument by
attempting to balance the
author’s considered opinion,
the primary sources from
contestants and the show
itself, and secondary sources
about the show to highlight the
issue and its complications in
the chosen reality television
show. The organization of the
critical review is somewhat
appropriate to its purpose, the
genre of the critical review,
and the audience.
The critical review makes an
inconsistent argument without
satisfactorily balancing the
author’s considered opinion,
the primary sources from
contestants and the show
itself, and secondary sources
about the show to highlight the
issue and its complications in
the chosen reality television
show. The organization of the
critical review is not
appropriate to its purpose, the
genre of the critical review,
and the audience.
TONE, LANGUAGE, & STYLE
The critical review uses an
exemplary tone and language
appropriate to the chosen
audience. The style of the critical
review is accessible and aimed
at the audience. It is not a 5-
paragraph essay or a term
paper, even though it contains
research and a sound argument.
The critical review uses a
proficient tone and language
appropriate to the chosen
audience. The style of the
critical review is mostly
accessible and aimed at the
audience. It is mostly not a 5-
paragraph essay or a term
paper, even though it contains
research and a sound
argument.
The critical review somewhat
uses a tone and language
appropriate to the chosen
audience. The style of the
critical review is somewhat
accessible and aimed at the
audience. It is somewhat
structured as a 5-paragraph
essay or a term paper, and it
somewhat contains research
and a sound argument.
The critical review
inconsistently uses a tone and
language appropriate to the
chosen audience. The style of
the critical review is not
accessible and not aimed at the
audience. It is structured as a
5-paragraph essay or a term
paper, and it does not contain
research and a sound
argument.
FORMAT & MLA STYLE—
The critical review is 3-5 pages and the
Reflection is 1-2 pages, all formatted in
MLA Style, double spaced, with page #s,
headers, 1” margins, 12-point font.
The critical review format is
exemplary.
The critical review format is
proficient.
The critical review format is
emerging.
The critical review format is
inconsistent.
REFLECTION—
The Reflection reflects on the process of
writing Project 2 and shows evidence of
intentional decisions about the chosen
issue and the review of the television
show. It discusses revision strategies,
new learning(s) for the writer, and
overall strengths and challenges of the
project
The Reflection shows exemplary
reflections on writing process
and decisions.
The Reflection shows
proficient reflections on
writing process and decisions.
The Reflection shows emerging
reflections on writing process
and decisions.
The Reflection shows
inconsistent reflections on
writing process and decisions,
or is absent. Project 2: “’Keepin’ It Real”: Reviewing a
Reality Television Show” / Dr. Catalina
Bartlett for WRA 101
Exemplary 4.0 Proficient 3.0 Emerging 2.0 Inconsistent 1.0
FOCUS—
The critical review analyzes a reality
television show on a specific
contemporary issue either explicitly or
implicitly found in the show. The review
creates a powerful and persuasive
argument about this issue with a
compelling angle, clear claim and
supporting fact-based evidence in the
form of primary and secondary sources.
The critical review has a clear purpose
and audience.
The critical review is an
exemplary persuasive argument,
using an identifiable angle to
draw readers in, and a clear
claim + supporting evidence to
highlight the chosen issue.
Primary and secondary sources
are incorporated into the
argument. The claim is the
author’s own (and not other
writers’ or scholars’), and the
supporting evidence supports
the author’s claim. Its purpose
and audience are completely
intentional.
The critical review is a
proficient persuasive
argument, using a mostly
identifiable angle to draw
readers in, and a relatively
clear claim + supporting
evidence to highlight the
chosen issue. Its purpose and
audience are mostly
intentional.
The critical review is an
emerging persuasive argument
using claim + evidence to
highlight the applicant’s skills,
knowledges, and abilities as a
potential contestant. Its
purpose and audience are
somewhat intentional.
The critical review offers an
inconsistent argument. It does
not have an identifiable angle,
nor does it use claim +
evidence persuasively to
highlight the chosen issue. s a
potential contestant. Its
purpose and audience are
unintentional.
DEVELOPMENT—
The critical review is persuasive in its
centering of the social issue, using an
angle, and arguing its claim through
factual evidence. This critical review
demonstrates this through a considered
authorial claim, the experiences of
contestants on the show and the show
itself, and other writers/scholars whose
fact-based research supports the
author’s claim. The writer interprets the
issue, the show’s handling of it, and the
potential impact on audience and/or
contestants.
The critical review, its focus on a
chosen social issue, and its
structure as a review are
significantly developed. The
author’s claim is clearly and
persuasively demonstrated
through their considered
interpretation, primary sources,
and secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation
strategically discusses the issue
as it is handled by the show.
The critical review, its focus
on a chosen social issue, and
its structure as a review are
mostly developed. The
author’s claim is mostly clear
and persuasive as
demonstrated through their
considered interpretation,
primary sources, and
secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation
mostly is strategic in
discussing the issue as it is
handled by the show.
The critical review, its focus on
a chosen social issue, and its
structure as a review are
somewhat developed. The
author’s claim is somewhat
clear and persuasive as
demonstrated through their
considered interpretation,
primary sources, and
secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation is
somewhat strategic in
discussing the issue as it is
handled by the show.
The critical review, its focus on
a chosen social issue, and its
structure as a review are
inconsistently developed. The
author’s claim is inconsistently
clear and persuasive as
demonstrated through their
considered interpretation,
primary sources, and
secondary sources. The
author’s interpretation is
inconsistently strategic in
discussing the issue as it is
handled by the show.
SOURCES—
The writer has incorporated a minimum
of 2 primary sources and 2 secondary
sources into their critical review. They
have used these sources to support their
own argument; they have not used the
sources the make the argument for
them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary sources
are incorporated into the
argument in an exemplary
fashion. The author has used
these sources persuasively and
well to support their own
argument. The author does not
rely on the sources to make the
argument for them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary
sources are mostly
incorporated into the
argument. The author has
used these sources mostly
well and persuasively to
support their own argument.
The author mostly does not
rely on the sources to make
the argument for them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary
sources are somewhat
incorporated into the
argument. The author has used
these sources somewhat well
and persuasively to support
their own argument. The
author somewhat does not rely
on the sources to make the
argument for them.
The minimum number of
primary and secondary
sources are inconsistently
incorporated into the
argument. The author has used
these sources inconsistently to
support their own argument.
The author relies on the
sources to make the argument
for them.
ARRANGEMENT—
The critical review argues persuasively
by balancing the author’s considered
opinion, the primary sources from
contestants and the show itself, and
secondary sources about the show to
highlight the issue and its complications
in the chosen reality television show.
The organization of the critical review is
appropriate to its purpose, the genre of
the critical review, and the audience.
The critical review argues
persuasively and exemplarily by
balancing the author’s
considered opinion, the primary
sources from contestants and
the show itself, and secondary
sources about the show to
highlight the issue and its
complications in the chosen
reality television show. The
organization of the critical
review is appropriate to its
purpose, the genre of the critical
review, and the audience.
The critical review argues
proficiently by balancing the
author’s considered opinion,
the primary sources from
contestants and the show
itself, and secondary sources
about the show to highlight
the issue and its
complications in the chosen
reality television show. The
organization of the critical
review is mostly appropriate
to its purpose, the genre of
the critical review, and the
audience.
The critical review makes an
emerging argument by
attempting to balance the
author’s considered opinion,
the primary sources from
contestants and the show
itself, and secondary sources
about the show to highlight the
issue and its complications in
the chosen reality television
show. The organization of the
critical review is somewhat
appropriate to its purpose, the
genre of the critical review,
and the audience.
The critical review makes an
inconsistent argument without
satisfactorily balancing the
author’s considered opinion,
the primary sources from
contestants and the show
itself, and secondary sources
about the show to highlight the
issue and its complications in
the chosen reality television
show. The organization of the
critical review is not
appropriate to its purpose, the
genre of the critical review,
and the audience.
TONE, LANGUAGE, & STYLE
The critical review uses an
exemplary tone and language
appropriate to the chosen
audience. The style of the critical
review is accessible and aimed
at the audience. It is not a 5-
paragraph essay or a term
paper, even though it contains
research and a sound argument.
The critical review uses a
proficient tone and language
appropriate to the chosen
audience. The style of the
critical review is mostly
accessible and aimed at the
audience. It is mostly not a 5-
paragraph essay or a term
paper, even though it contains
research and a sound
argument.
The critical review somewhat
uses a tone and language
appropriate to the chosen
audience. The style of the
critical review is somewhat
accessible and aimed at the
audience. It is somewhat
structured as a 5-paragraph
essay or a term paper, and it
somewhat contains research
and a sound argument.
The critical review
inconsistently uses a tone and
language appropriate to the
chosen audience. The style of
the critical review is not
accessible and not aimed at the
audience. It is structured as a
5-paragraph essay or a term
paper, and it does not contain
research and a sound
argument.
FORMAT & MLA STYLE—
The critical review is 3-5 pages and the
Reflection is 1-2 pages, all formatted in
MLA Style, double spaced, with page #s,
headers, 1” margins, 12-point font.
The critical review format is
exemplary.
The critical review format is
proficient.
The critical review format is
emerging.
The critical review format is
inconsistent.
REFLECTION—
The Reflection reflects on the process of
writing Project 2 and shows evidence of
intentional decisions about the chosen
issue and the review of the television
show. It discusses revision strategies,
new learning(s) for the writer, and
overall strengths and challenges of the
project
The Reflection shows exemplary
reflections on writing process
and decisions.
The Reflection shows
proficient reflections on
writing process and decisions.
The Reflection shows emerging
reflections on writing process
and decisions.
The Reflection shows
inconsistent reflections on
writing process and decisions,
or is absent.
Get professional assignment help cheaply
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason may is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Our essay writers are graduates with diplomas, bachelor, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college diploma. When assigning your order, we match the paper subject with the area of specialization of the writer.
Why choose our academic writing service?
Plagiarism free papers
Timely delivery
Any deadline
Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
Subject-relevant academic writer
Adherence to paper instructions
Ability to tackle bulk assignments
Reasonable prices
24/7 Customer Support
Get superb grades consistently
Get Professional Assignment Help Cheaply
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason may is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Our essay writers are graduates with diplomas, bachelor’s, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college diploma. When assigning your order, we match the paper subject with the area of specialization of the writer.
Why Choose Our Academic Writing Service?
Plagiarism free papers
Timely delivery
Any deadline
Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
Subject-relevant academic writer
Adherence to paper instructions
Ability to tackle bulk assignments
Reasonable prices
24/7 Customer Support
Get superb grades consistently
How It Works
1. Place an order
You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.
2. Pay for the order
Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.
3. Track the progress
You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.
4. Download the paper
The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH Essay fount TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
The post Critical review on The Kardashians appeared first on Essay fount.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
