first, name the author and the title of your editorial (remember to put in quotes!), where it was published (remember to italicize!), the date the editorial was published, In a sentence or so, tell the author’s main argument in the editorial.Then, answer the ethos, logos, and pathos questions on the Editorial Analysis assignment sheet.
and here is the link of my editorial: irst, name the author and the title of your editorial (remember to put in quotes!), where it was published (remember to italicize!), the date the editorial was published, In a sentence or so, tell the author’s main argument in the editorial.Then, answer the ethos, logos, and pathos questions on the Editorial Analysis assignment sheet.
and here is the link of my editorial: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/15/opinion/trump-w… >These are the questions that you are supposed to answer:Ethos refers to the authorâ€s credibility, based on the authorâ€s background and on the tone used in the argument. discuss the authorâ€s background credentials,.CREDENTIALS and EXPERTISE: what are the writer’s credentials ie education, jobs held, awards, and reputation? Does the writer have a stake in the topic being argued? Does the writerâ€s personal stake give him or her expertise on the subject? Overall, does the authorâ€s credentials and/or life experience strengthen his/her ethos?TONE: What is the writer’s tone? Identify words, phrases or statements that illustrate the writer’s tone. Is the tone effective? Why or why not? Does the tone help or hinder the argument being made?FAIRNESS TO OPPOSITION: Does the writer treat their opposition with respect and see both sides of the issue well? Or, is the writer very one-sided, biased, sarcastic, or abusive of the opponent’s viewpoint?Overall, based on the authorâ€s credentials, tone, and treatment of the opposing view, does the author have strong ethos in the editorial?Logos refers to the logical aspect of the argument. To analyze if the author uses logos effectively, you will need to identify and assess the authorâ€s thesis/main point and the supporting reasons; analyze the quality of the evidence used to support these arguments; and assess the authorâ€s discussion of the opposing view.REASONING: What is the main argument being made in the editorial? What are the supporting reasons? Is the logic of the main and supporting arguments strong or do they contain fallacies (‘mistakes’ in reasoning)? If so, what are these mistakes?QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: Are the premises and conclusions of the argument strong? Is the evidence accurate, relevant, representative, and sufficient enough to prove the point? What is the source of the evidence? What authorities are cited to support the premises? Are these authorities reliable and credible? Has the evidence been manipulated in questionable ways? Overall, is the quality of the evidence used effective? Why/why not?COUNTERPOSITIONS: Does the writer anticipate and deal with objections and questions effectively enough to satisfy doubts or questions you might have about their position.Overall, based on the above, is the logical aspect of the argument effective? Are you persuaded by the arguments and evidence?Pathos refers to the emotional appeals an author uses to persuade the audience in a way that facts and logic cannot. To connect with an audience emotionally, a writer can appeal to the shared values of the audience, and can use language to add power to their arguments.Are there any places where the writer attempts to invoke an emotional response? Where do you find appeals to shared values with the audience? You are a member of that audience, so what values do you hold in common with the writer? What values do you not hold in common? Does the author effectively appeal to shared values to convince the audience?What emotions does the writer use in persuading you to accept the conclusion(s) of the piece? Identify specific emotions such as fear, indignation, anger, contempt, pride, and the like. Identify LANGUAGE (words, phrases, images, analogies, euphemisms, strongly-worded phrases, or figurative language). Are the emotional appeals SAPPY? Are they effective?
Based on the authorâ€s use of emotional language and appeals to shared values, does the author effectively use pathos?>These are the questions that you are supposed to answer:Ethos refers to the authorâ€s credibility, based on the authorâ€s background and on the tone used in the argument. discuss the authorâ€s background credentials,.CREDENTIALS and EXPERTISE: what are the writer’s credentials ie education, jobs held, awards, and reputation? Does the writer have a stake in the topic being argued? Does the writerâ€s personal stake give him or her expertise on the subject? Overall, does the authorâ€s credentials and/or life experience strengthen his/her ethos?TONE: What is the writer’s tone? Identify words, phrases or statements that illustrate the writer’s tone. Is the tone effective? Why or why not? Does the tone help or hinder the argument being made?FAIRNESS TO OPPOSITION: Does the writer treat their opposition with respect and see both sides of the issue well? Or, is the writer very one-sided, biased, sarcastic, or abusive of the opponent’s viewpoint?Overall, based on the authorâ€s credentials, tone, and treatment of the opposing view, does the author have strong ethos in the editorial?Logos refers to the logical aspect of the argument. To analyze if the author uses logos effectively, you will need to identify and assess the authorâ€s thesis/main point and the supporting reasons; analyze the quality of the evidence used to support these arguments; and assess the authorâ€s discussion of the opposing view.REASONING: What is the main argument being made in the editorial? What are the supporting reasons? Is the logic of the main and supporting arguments strong or do they contain fallacies (‘mistakes’ in reasoning)? If so, what are these mistakes?QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: Are the premises and conclusions of the argument strong? Is the evidence accurate, relevant, representative, and sufficient enough to prove the point? What is the source of the evidence? What authorities are cited to support the premises? Are these authorities reliable and credible? Has the evidence been manipulated in questionable ways? Overall, is the quality of the evidence used effective? Why/why not?COUNTERPOSITIONS: Does the writer anticipate and deal with objections and questions effectively enough to satisfy doubts or questions you might have about their position.Overall, based on the above, is the logical aspect of the argument effective? Are you persuaded by the arguments and evidence?Pathos refers to the emotional appeals an author uses to persuade the audience in a way that facts and logic cannot. To connect with an audience emotionally, a writer can appeal to the shared values of the audience, and can use language to add power to their arguments.Are there any places where the writer attempts to invoke an emotional response? Where do you find appeals to shared values with the audience? You are a member of that audience, so what values do you hold in common with the writer? What values do you not hold in common? Does the author effectively appeal to shared values to convince the audience?What emotions does the writer use in persuading you to accept the conclusion(s) of the piece? Identify specific emotions such as fear, indignation, anger, contempt, pride, and the like. Identify LANGUAGE (words, phrases, images, analogies, euphemisms, strongly-worded phrases, or figurative language). Are the emotional appeals SAPPY? Are they effective?
Based on the authorâ€s use of emotional language and appeals to shared values, does the author effectively use pathos?
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
The post answer-the-following-questions-on-at-least-a-page appeared first on Essay Fount.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
