
INSTRUCTION
Please read
Article 7 – Raines & Robinson, 2018
Article 8 – Smithburger et al., 2017
JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies
I have attached 2 article + JBI CRITICAL FOR COHORT STUDIES to do this assignment. For each article, answer 11 question in checklist and explain by 2-3 sentences.
JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies
Reviewer/NURS 3190 Team Date
Article Author/s Year Level of Evidence
Yes | No | Unclear | Not applicable | |
1. Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? | □ | □ | □ | |
2. Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people
to both exposed and unexposed groups? |
□ | □ | □ | |
3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | □ | □ | □ | |
4. Were confounding factors identified? | □ | □ | □ | |
5. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | □ | □ | □ | |
6. Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? | □ | □ | □ | |
7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? | □ | □ | □ | |
8. Was the follow up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? | □ | □ | □ | |
9. Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? | □ | □ | □ | |
10. Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? | □ | □ | □ | |
11. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | □ | □ | □ |
Supporting Information and Reasoning
The body of your paper uses a half-inch first line indent and is double-spaced. APA style provides for up to five heading levels, shown in the paragraphs that follow. Note that the word Introduction should not be used as an initial heading, as it’s assumed that your paper begins with an introduction.
Table of Contents
Heading 1
Body 1 of supporting information. No QUOTES only paraphrasing with citations at the end of each paragraph
Conclusion/Overall Appraisal
References
Moola, S., Munn, Z., Tufanaru, C., Aromataris, E., Sears, Sfetcu, R., . . . Mu, P-F. (2017). Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), Joanna Briggs Institute reviewer’s manual, The Joanna Briggs Institute. Retrieved from https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/
Raines, D. A., & Robinson, J. (2018). Format of parent education material preferred by new mothers. Clinical Nursing Research, 1054773818790007. doi:10.1177/1054773818790007
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
